

What is it with Christians and their hate for Harry Potter, anyway? It's like they've got nothing better to do.
I picked up the paper today and saw a small article with "Christians Blast J.K Rowling". And I went, gah, not again. Apparently, now they're going after the gay comment about Dumbledore. It was only recently that Rowling herself announced that the professor was homosexual, and that he was once in love with a would-be dark wizard. When I read about it, I thought, okay, well that explains why he doesn't have a wife. I mean, all the while I had the impression that he was either dysfunctional or too passionate about his job to bother.
But did the Christian community leave it at that? No, they couldn't! It was against the very laws of their oh-so-great religion. Why, is it so difficult for them to accept that different people can have different sexual orientations? There is nothing new about homosexuality. Since the dawn of mankind, there has been someone who preferred something more familiar. Ever since hierarchy was established, people have discriminated against those who were different. And to them, different sexual habits was a grave difference. Since most law actually stems from what most would like to believe to be Christian influences, people were quick to condemn anything that seems to go against G_d's wishes. I refuse to use that word in this post, for the people who follow him are hopelessly blinded at this point of time.
And so, what did they do about it? Even since Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone(Not Sorcerer's stone. They only changed it because illiterate people couldn't read "Philosopher's") was released, hardcore religious fanatics began an outcry that has lasted till today. A good eight years or so. At that time, they related witchcraft to devil worship, even though the word "Devil" is not used in any context of hell in the entire series. Apparently, those who enjoyed reading Harry Potter books were all sinners and would go to hell, for wanting to perform Pagan practices.
Now, you'd think that they'd realise that real witchcraft was a lot more than waving a stick around and saying a few funny words. Actual witchcraft from the Victorian times was actually a lot more benign than most people would think. Witches were not evil, rather, they were like a kind of olden scientist. Though, they went looking for connections which are actually, not scientific. But my point is, they were just misunderstood people who were thought the inflict harm and destruction on others.
Come to that, if Harry Potter's version of witchcraft and wizardry is so much different from it's actual Pagan roots, then why don't Pagans start jumping up and screaming "Blasphemy!", like the Catholics did when The Da Vinci Code was released? I'll tell you why. It's exactly the same reason the phrase "Holier than Thou" was created. Christians have this jumped-up sense of superiority, that their religion is the only correct one, and that it is flawless, despite the many contradictions and mistakes in their guidebook. I mean, bible.
Now, here's a quote from today's article, so I can emphasise my point.
"It's not a good example for our children, who really like the books and the movies. I think it encourages homosexuality."
-Roberta Combs, president of the Christian Coalition of America
This is, of course, in relation to the thing with Dumbledore being gay. Now, I'm going to pick this quote apart. I find, that adults these days, worry too much about children being easily influenced. While I don't blame them(because we have a fair share of idiots in our generation), I think that the whole anti-gay thing is unnecessary. For one, most people who read books and care about them, are not idiots. This means, that they are unlikely to care whether one of the main characters was gay or not. Secondly, a gay character does not encourage homosexuality. A gay character gives people greater insights into their rather different lifestyle, which only serves to give knowledge and instill learning. If you can accept that Dumbledore is gay, then you can benefit from that information. Again, I say. Gay characters do no encourage gayness. People are gay regardless of the fiction they read.
And here's another quote.
"Harry Potter, an orphaned witch, is one hero who has captured the innocent heart of many children. When such a hero uses evil as a problem-solving tool, we need to be warned. Over time, the child can become adapted to the dark world of witchcraft and not know that it's dangerous."
-Jack M. Roper, TV evangelist of the Christian Broadcasting Network
First of all, Harry Potter is a wizard. How many witches do you know that get married to other witches, and are able to procreate? Secondly, witchcraft is not evil. I do not know where people get these ideas from. As I have explained earlier, people feared witches only because they were different, and some say, superior. Furthermore, a child cannot adapt to a dark world, when there is no dark world. The darkest characters you can find in the series... are of course the death eaters, but seriously, which popular movie/book series doesn't have villains? Hell, even Heroes has Sylar. Lost has The Others.
Christians are just completely missing the point. It's like Star Wars. There's the Light side, and there's the Dark side. In case it wasn't clear enough, Harry is on the Light side, and he's fighting Darth Voldemort.
"...can become adapted to the dark world of witchcraft and not know that it's dangerous."
Let me ask all of you. See what you think. How can something that doesn't exist be dangerous? Does that make any sense to you at all? I suppose the Bogeyman is dangerous, even though he doesn't exist. People, things that don't exist can't be dangerous, because they don't exist. There are absolutely no accounts of people being able to wave a stick around and levitate objects. Unless you count illusionists, who, as the name implies, trick you for the sake of it. You cannot shoot flames from a wand, or transform into a llama, just because it can happen in a book.
There are people all over the world who have petitioned for the series to be banned. And all these people make claims and draw conclusions which just spit in the face of logic. Harry Potter encourages witchcraft. Harry Potter is evil. Reading Harry Potter will make you evil. And there's more now. Reading Harry Potter will make you gay.
Why can't people just accept that fiction is fiction, and that not everyone is as weak-minded and gullible as this situation implies?
And in case someone who so very whole-heartedly supports the anti HP move, here's a definition of fiction for you:
something feigned, invented, or imagined; a made-up story: We've all heard the fiction of her being in delicate health.
Key words: Feigned, Invented, Imagined, Made-up.
It is not real, people. It's more retarded to bash Harry Potter than to organise a mission to stop Hitler.
What's next, Harry Potter encourages lesbian relationships? I mean, what do you think Lavender and Parvati are always doing together? I can almost see someone writing in to the papers about that one day. People just never give up.
Sigh.
-Joe